Compare Nissan Micra 1.0 and Kia Picanto 1.0 MPI
Mon, 20 May 2024

Compare Ford Grand C-Max 2.0 TDCi and Chevrolet Orlando 2.0 TD (96 kw)

Technical specifications
Clear list
Ford Grand C-Max
Chevrolet Orlando
Totals Ford Grand C-Max 2.0 TDCi × Chevrolet Orlando 2.0 TD (96 kw) ×
MarkFordChevrolet
ModelGrand C-Max 2.0 TDCiOrlando 2.0 TD (96 kw)
Year20102011
Number of doors/seats5/(5-7)5/7
Body typeMPVMPV
Unladen Weight1500-
Gross Weight Limit--
Top Speed, km/h198180
Acceleration 0-100 kph10.510.3
Minimum turning radius, m5.75.65
Cargo Volume, min/max, L470/174089/466/1500
Dimensions specifications, mm Ford Grand C-Max 2.0 TDCi × Chevrolet Orlando 2.0 TD (96 kw) ×
Length45204652
Width18281836
Height16841633
Wheelbase27882760
Front/rear Track1559/15691584/1588
Ground clearance--
Engine specifications Ford Grand C-Max 2.0 TDCi × Chevrolet Orlando 2.0 TD (96 kw) ×
Typeturbo diesel Common Railturbo diesel Common Rail
Displacement, cm3 19971998
Compression ratio1616.3
Number and arrangement of cylinders4 cylinders, in-line4 cylinders, in-line
The diameter of the cylinder x stroke, mm85x8886х86
Number of valves1616
Power, hp/rpm140/3750130/3800
Max torque, Nm/RPM320/1750-2750315/2000
Transmission specifications Ford Grand C-Max 2.0 TDCi × Chevrolet Orlando 2.0 TD (96 kw) ×
Gearbox6-speed automatic6-speed manual
Drive TypeFront wheel drive (dynamic stabilization ESP)Front wheel drive
Suspension specifications Ford Grand C-Max 2.0 TDCi × Chevrolet Orlando 2.0 TD (96 kw) ×
Front
MacPherson strut

MacPherson strut
Rear
multi-link suspensions

Dependent suspensions
Tire Size215/55/16
215/60/16, 225/50/17
Disk5x108 ET52 d63.3
5x114.3 ET41 d70.1
Brakes specifications Ford Grand C-Max 2.0 TDCi × Chevrolet Orlando 2.0 TD (96 kw) ×
FrontVentilated discsVentilated discs
RearDiscsDiscs
Fuel consumption specifications, L/100 km Ford Grand C-Max 2.0 TDCi × Chevrolet Orlando 2.0 TD (96 kw) ×
City7.58
Highway55
Combined5.86
FuelDieselDiesel
Tank, L6064
Clear list
Ford Grand C-Max
Chevrolet Orlando