Compare Nissan Micra 1.0 and Kia Picanto 1.0 MPI
Sun, 19 May 2024

Compare Chevrolet Orlando 2.0 TD (96 kw) and Ford Grand C-Max 2.0 TDCi

Technical specifications
Clear list
Chevrolet Orlando
Ford Grand C-Max
Totals Chevrolet Orlando 2.0 TD (96 kw) × Ford Grand C-Max 2.0 TDCi ×
MarkChevroletFord
ModelOrlando 2.0 TD (96 kw)Grand C-Max 2.0 TDCi
Year20112010
Number of doors/seats5/75/(5-7)
Body typeMPVMPV
Unladen Weight-1500
Gross Weight Limit--
Top Speed, km/h180198
Acceleration 0-100 kph10.310.5
Minimum turning radius, m5.655.7
Cargo Volume, min/max, L89/466/1500470/1740
Dimensions specifications, mm Chevrolet Orlando 2.0 TD (96 kw) × Ford Grand C-Max 2.0 TDCi ×
Length46524520
Width18361828
Height16331684
Wheelbase27602788
Front/rear Track1584/15881559/1569
Ground clearance--
Engine specifications Chevrolet Orlando 2.0 TD (96 kw) × Ford Grand C-Max 2.0 TDCi ×
Typeturbo diesel Common Railturbo diesel Common Rail
Displacement, cm3 19981997
Compression ratio16.316
Number and arrangement of cylinders4 cylinders, in-line4 cylinders, in-line
The diameter of the cylinder x stroke, mm86х8685x88
Number of valves1616
Power, hp/rpm130/3800140/3750
Max torque, Nm/RPM315/2000320/1750-2750
Transmission specifications Chevrolet Orlando 2.0 TD (96 kw) × Ford Grand C-Max 2.0 TDCi ×
Gearbox6-speed manual6-speed automatic
Drive TypeFront wheel driveFront wheel drive (dynamic stabilization ESP)
Suspension specifications Chevrolet Orlando 2.0 TD (96 kw) × Ford Grand C-Max 2.0 TDCi ×
Front
MacPherson strut

MacPherson strut
Rear
Dependent suspensions

multi-link suspensions
Tire Size215/60/16, 225/50/17
215/55/16
Disk5x114.3 ET41 d70.1
5x108 ET52 d63.3
Brakes specifications Chevrolet Orlando 2.0 TD (96 kw) × Ford Grand C-Max 2.0 TDCi ×
FrontVentilated discsVentilated discs
RearDiscsDiscs
Fuel consumption specifications, L/100 km Chevrolet Orlando 2.0 TD (96 kw) × Ford Grand C-Max 2.0 TDCi ×
City87.5
Highway55
Combined65.8
FuelDieselDiesel
Tank, L6460
Clear list
Chevrolet Orlando
Ford Grand C-Max