Compare Nissan Micra 1.0 and Kia Picanto 1.0 MPI
Fri, 17 May 2024

Compare Nissan Altima 2.5 and Ford Mondeo 2.0 EcoBoost Sedan (199 PS)

Technical specifications
Clear list
Nissan Altima
Ford Mondeo
Totals Nissan Altima 2.5 × Ford Mondeo 2.0 EcoBoost Sedan (199 PS) ×
MarkNissanFord
ModelAltima 2.5Mondeo 2.0 EcoBoost Sedan (199 PS)
Year20152014
Number of doors/seats4/54/5
Body typeSedanSedan
Unladen Weight14501562
Gross Weight Limit1920-
Top Speed, km/h-232
Acceleration 0-100 kph-8.7
Minimum turning radius, m-5.8
Cargo Volume, min/max, L436516
Dimensions specifications, mm Nissan Altima 2.5 × Ford Mondeo 2.0 EcoBoost Sedan (199 PS) ×
Length48744871
Width18291852
Height14681482
Wheelbase27762850
Front/rear Track1585/15851599/1595
Ground clearance137128
Engine specifications Nissan Altima 2.5 × Ford Mondeo 2.0 EcoBoost Sedan (199 PS) ×
Typepetrol InjectionGasoline Direct Injection, turbocharging
Displacement, cm3 24881999
Compression ratio10.310
Number and arrangement of cylinders4 cylinders, in-line4 cylinders, in-line
The diameter of the cylinder x stroke, mm89x10087.5x83.1
Number of valves1616
Power, hp/rpm182/6000199/6000
Max torque, Nm/RPM245/4000300/1750-4500
Transmission specifications Nissan Altima 2.5 × Ford Mondeo 2.0 EcoBoost Sedan (199 PS) ×
GearboxCVT6-speed automatic PowerShift
Drive TypeFront wheel driveFront wheel drive
Suspension specifications Nissan Altima 2.5 × Ford Mondeo 2.0 EcoBoost Sedan (199 PS) ×
Front
MacPherson strut

MacPherson strut
Rear
multi-link suspensions

multi-link suspensions
Tire Size215/60 R16, 215/55 R17, 235/45 R18
215/60 R16
Disk5x114.3 ET45 d66.1
5x108 ET55 d63.3
Brakes specifications Nissan Altima 2.5 × Ford Mondeo 2.0 EcoBoost Sedan (199 PS) ×
FrontVentilated discsVentilated discs
RearDiscsDiscs
Fuel consumption specifications, L/100 km Nissan Altima 2.5 × Ford Mondeo 2.0 EcoBoost Sedan (199 PS) ×
City8.710.2
Highway65.6
Combined7.67.3
Fuel9595
Tank, L7263
Clear list
Nissan Altima
Ford Mondeo